NEW RESEARCH STUDY SHOWS INEFFICACIES OF MAMMOGRAMS:

As a doctor and a woman with fibrocystic breast disease, it truly bothers me when I hear X-Ray Mammography misstated as preventive medicine. X-Rays are never, form or type prevention. X-Ray Mammography goes to best a type of early discovery of bust cancer cells, but it can just locate a growth after it has grown to a substantial dimension. Even after that, X-Ray Mammography misses out on 50 percent of the lumps in women, who have thick breasts. Given that over 50% of premenopausal females and also 25 percent of postmenopausal females have dense busts, a huge number of females go to danger of misdiagnosis by counting exclusively on X-Ray Mammography. This is specifically real for females with fibrocystic breast condition-- or for females with scar cells in their breasts.I am directlyreally concerned regarding finding bust illness because of my household background-- my sis died of breast cancer when she was 41. That's why I began obtaining Infrared Mammograms many years ago. Unlike X-Rays, Infrared Mammography does not call for contact with your busts or direct exposure to hazardous radiation. While X-Ray Mammograms are pictures of the breast makeup, Infrared MAMMOGRAMS are pictures of your bust metabolic rate, so that even pre-cancerous swelling or tiny lumps can be detected, due to the fact that they produce added heat due to boosted blood flow.